The Blockchain Mirage: Is Tech Overreach Undermining U.S. Foreign Aid?

April 03, 2025

In early 2025, the Trump administration unveiled a sweeping overhaul of U.S. foreign aid policy. The rebranded U.S. International Humanitarian Assistance (IHA) agency promised a tech-forward future—with blockchain at the centerof its strategy.

According to the administration, blockchain would increase transparency, reduce fraud, and bring “outcomes-based accountability” to aid. But critics argue this plan risks undermining the very systems and relationships that have made U.S. humanitarian work effective for decades.

So is this innovation—or overreach?

Diagram 1 - How Blockchain Works in Foreign Aid (ADB, 2023)

What Blockchain Promises—and Where It Falls Short

On paper, blockchain looks ideal for humanitarian logistics, as shown in diagram 1.

Diagram 2 - Pilot Projects in Kenya (UNHCR, 2023)

  • Every transaction can be logged transparently.

  • Funds and goods are traceable end to end.

  • As shown in Diagram 2, Pilot programs in Jordan and Kenya show some early success in voucher delivery.

But foreign aid isn't a controlled supply chain. It operates in chaotic, often lawless environments where rigid systems don’t adapt well. Aid delivery requires discretion, flexibility, and human judgment—traits blockchain isn’t built for.

When success or failure is measured in lives saved—not ledger entries—there’s little margin for error.

Is This Really About Technology? Or Power?

Many experts suggest the blockchain pivot is less about innovation and more about centralizing control.

  • The plan shifts authority from USAID to the State Department and political appointees.

  • NGOs worry it could sideline experienced aid professionals in favor of untested tech governance.

  • Costs could reach billions in infrastructure, training, and compliance—especially for under-resourced partners.

The risk? A blockchain layer that serves central command rather than field operations, reinforcing top-down structures rather than empowering local actors.

Digital Hype Meets Global Reality

Diagram 2 - World Heatmap of Internet Infrastructure (CDO Times, 2023)

The challenges get bigger when blockchain meets global infrastructure gaps:

  • Internet connectivity is limited in many aid zones, as shown in Diagram 2.

  • Digital identity systems are lacking, which undermines traceability.

  • Blockchain may record that aid was delivered—even if it wasn’t.

And what happens when errors occur? Smart contracts don’t adjust on the fly. Unlike human-led logistics, a coding flaw could halt aid flows indefinitely.

The Bigger Issue: Techno-Solutionism

Blockchain’s most dangerous role may be as a distraction from the real causes of aid inefficiency.

  • Corruption isn’t just a tech failure—it’s a political problem.

  • Broken systems require stronger governance, not just digital tools.

  • Poorly implemented tech can create a false sense of transparency, while enabling new forms of fraud.

Even the United Nations has backed away from blockchain pilots, citing logistical hurdles and questionable outcomes.

Final Thought: Innovation or Illusion?

Foreign aid needs improvement. But betting on blockchain to solve deeply rooted challenges may be more illusion than innovation.

When digital infrastructure is imposed without field context, it risks weakening trust, exacerbating power imbalances, and disrupting critical humanitarian flows.

Blockchain can have a role—in donor reporting, fraud prevention, or procurement. But as the core of foreign aid strategy? That’s a gamble with high stakes and uncertain returns.

What do you think—breakthrough or buzzword? Reply and let us know.

Found this analysis helpful? Subscribe for more on blockchain policy, global finance, and the tech shaping tomorrow’s institutions.

Works Cited 

UNHCR. “UNHCR Breaks Ground on First Financial Guarantee-Backed Solar Power Projects in Refugee Settings.” UNHCR News, 2023, https://www.unhcr.org/news/unhcr-breaks-ground-first-financial-guarantee-backed-solar-power-projects-refugee-settings.